All Appropriate Technologies Blog — A blog about efficiency and effectiveness of technology.
headermask image

header image

Off topic: So long, Billy.

There have been lots of celebrity deaths this past week.  Ed McMahon, Michael Jackson, Farah Fawcett and Billy Mays.

It cannot be said that Ed McMahon didn’t live a long, full life.  I don’t really have much of a connection with him, but I wish his family well. I’m just wondering who will deliver oversized cheques from Publisher’s Clearinghouse now?

Farah Fawcett’s primary claim to fame was her looks.  Anyone who watched the Comedy Central Roast of William Shatner (in which she was one of the roasters) realizes that there really wasn’t much going on inside her head. Her career was already in the past, and, to be honest, I didn’t think she was even as pretty as all that . . . but then, I’m actually, unlike many men, not partial to blondes, and I really can’t stand non-thinkers.  I’m very sorry she had to go in such a slow and painful way.  Again, sympathy to her fans and family and fans.

Michael Jackson . . . where the hell do I begin?  How about good riddance?  I will admit that I was briefly a fan in the early 80’s, before Pepsi set him on fire (literally), and I will grant that he had a hard childhood.  Apparently, his father was a rat bastard.  None the less, as I see it, he failed to rise above that, and ended up being a strange, scary, sick, and, I believe, dangerous individual.  I know no charges of paedophilia stuck, but if I had children, they wouldn’t be allowed within 100 metres of him.  I know there are people who still like him, and I’m offending their idol, but that’s tough.  I came to my senses before I came of age, and I feel that a paedophile has been removed from circulation.  Unfortunately, I also believe in reincarnation, so he’s probably going to be back.

Then there’s Billy Mays.  Yeah, I know, he’s a salesman.  I have always enjoyed watching him work, though.  No nonsense, just flat out:  here’s what I’m selling; here’s what it does; here, watch this!  How can you argue with that?  I never did buy any Oxi-Clean or Orange Glow, but I did enjoy the show.  So long, Billy, you will be missed.

DTV Transition thoughts.

So now the DTV transition is finally done. We can now get on with the debugging.

Locally, I have been enjoying DTV for some time now. I’ve generally gotten better reception than with analogue, and it has been good.

In the pre-transition period, all of the channels but one were using their final frequencies. Channel 6, for some reason, though, had decided to move their digital signal to the frequency used for analogue 6 after switching off the analogue signal. I can’t figure why they did this, because it means they have to buy more equipment, but whatever.

With channel 13 switching off their analogue signal, I now get channel 51, previously unavailable to me because their signal is on the frequyency that was used for analogue 13.

All is well in the upstairs of my house.

Unfortunately, downstairs, we have a problem getting channel 6 now. This is happening at the same time that channel 6 is in a pissing match with our satellite provider and theatening to pull their signal off.

But it worked before, so I’m puzzled why they messed with it.

More to come as things develop, I guess.

The Hybrid’s Achilles’ Heel

It makes sense when you think about it, but hybrids have one serious flaw in that they are typically reliant on having both fuel in the tank and juice in the battery in order to work right. Think about it: a Prius has a 76 horsepower gasoline engine and a 67 horsepower electric motor. Taken alone, neither will be very punchy; put together,they can pack a surprising whallop!

As I’ve mentioned at times in the passt, I commute by bus for most of the year (typically foregoing it during the winter months). Many of the buses owned by CDTA, and particularly those bought in the last three years, are hybrids.

This morning, one of the two buses it takes me to get to work was a brand-new hybrid. I don’t know if this was its first trip ever, but it had to be close.

I think that the driver had never driven a hybrid before, because, going around the loop in downtown Albany, he kept putting his foot right into it hard to get started, like what you would do with one of the diesels. Unlike a diesel, however, it took off like a bat out of hell!

I think he killed the battery doing this.

Not five minutes later, the bus was trudging up the Third Ave. Hill in Rensselaer, barely hitting 30 MPH, I would guess, and unable to get moving any faster.

I’m sure the battery level recovered some time after I got off, but I found this interesting, because it demonstrates a flaw in the assumptios of hybrid vehicle design.

Just for the record, lest I be accused of being anti-hybrid, I am only anti-hybrid in that I would prefer to see pure electric vehicles, but hybrids are a good step forward, and away from purely fuel-powered vehicles.

Numbers

Just a couple of observations about numbers used to identify things.

My sister was musing to me recently that she can never remember my wireline phone number, largely because the city in which we both live has some phone numbers which begin with 347 and other, older numbers that start with 374. For that matter, most 4chenectady phone numbers begin with 37, so for mine to turn that pattern around causes confusion.

our local transit authority has recently begun re-numbering the bus routes, so that they are all getting three-digit numbers, and they do actually have this pretty well planned out. They started in Saratoga County, giving all of those routes numbers in the 400’s, then they renumbered the rural routes with numbers in the 800’s.

They have just started working on the shuttles (600’s) and expresses (500’s).

And then there is Rensselaer County (200’s) . . .

There are two buses that run from Albany to Rensselaer. One is route 24, which I use; the other used to be called 14 . . . Until they renumbered it to 214.

Oh, I almost forgot — these two routes overlap.

I ride the 24 to work and back every day. Ever since the day they changed 14 to 214, I’ve seen a lot of people I don’t normally see on the 24 getting on at one stop, and getting off two stops later, when the bus makes a different turn than they were expecting :)

They could have fixed this very easily, just by renumbering both routes at the same time.

In other places, I can see that people get it. The two U.S. Highway systems are deliberately numbered to keep like-numbered highways apart. U.S. Highways are numbered low in the east and north; high in the south and west; Interstate highways are low in the west and south and high in the north and east. Both have odd numbers for north-south and even for east-west.

These really are freshman mistakes that could be avoided to limit confusion.

The One True Purpose

This morning, my computer had a little functionality hiccup that got me wondering: why is this even possible?

The problem stemmed from the Num Lock key on the keyboard getting out of sync. The light was lit, but hitting the numeric keypad keys didn’t get me any numbers, instead the cursor moved around the spreadsheet I was editing.

It’s a minor annoyance, really, but an annoyance none the less. More to the point, it left me pondering why we still even need this “Num Lock” key.

Well, of course it is there for a reason. In the early 80’s, when IBM first introduced the PC, it came with a smaller keyboard. The ten keys between the numeric keypad and the main part of the keyboard weren’t there. The keypad had these cursor movement functions on them because that was how you moved the cursor.

Later on, however, IBM came to reali2 that the PC was being taken far more seriously by their customers than they had anticipated (they thought anything other than a mainframe was a joke) and they added the ten keys to the keyboard.

So now, consider this from my perspective of having come to the world of the PC late. In the 80’s and 90’s, I was a user of Commodore computers. These machines either had a numeric keypad that — get this — only did numbers, or, in one case (Commodore 64) had no numeric keypad. Prior to owning and using a PC, I also was a regular user of an Apple III (no, not a typo) which had a numeric keypad that just did numbers, and through college and early working life, regularly used mainframes, for which the keypad just did numbers.

Now, I understand that the earliest machines to have these extra ten keys needed to be able to emulate this bassackwards system of using the keypad for navigation — the early software might not recognize the new keys, but surely, by the time I bought my first PC in 1996, finally giving up on my preferred Amiga platform, these problems would have been resolved.

So here it is, 13 years later, and I’m still getting bit in the ass by this stupid kludge that was introduced over 20 years ago because IBM couldn’t read the writing on the walls. Really, in this day and age, what purpose does a numeric keypad serve, besides to type numbers? Great. Can we please ditch the NumLock key now, and all of the crap that it brings with it?

Using electricity for everything

Outlet (Icon)

My sister, the Budding Locavore, has been recently working on putting in a garden with some friends of hers.  While she was waiting on someone else to come up with a rototiller, I told her that I had one that she could borrow, to which her response was that I am “made of win and topped with awesomesauce.“  A little further in on her post, though, she says:

It’s electrical in nature, which is a bit odd

Yep, I admit it is a bit odd.  It is odd enough that I had to search high and low to find one like it.  You see, I’m one of these screwballs that is not really satisfied with the status quo and will find ways to do things that I think are better, even if they come along with their own sets of problems.

In this case, the problem that comes along with it is providing it with electrical power.  You have to use an extension cord to power it.  For me, this is not a really big issue, because I have over 100m of extension cords in various weights at home, because, put simply, I use electricity for everything.  Well, almost everything.  I still drive a gasoline-powered car, but only because electric cars are out of reach.

Why?

In a nutshell, here are the things you have to deal with if you use a gasoline-powered lawn mower, rototiller, hedge-trimmer, chainsaw, whatever:

  • Fuel
  • Exhaust fumes
  • Noise
  • Oil
  • High complexity

By comparison, an electrical appliance has these problems:

  • Lower power ceiling (i.e. you max out at about 2 HP — you might be able to get up to 4 HP in some places, such as Europe, where a higher voltage is used)
  • Power cords

Interestingly enough, Ryobi, who manufactured my rototiller, also make a gasoline-powered one on the same chassis.  It uses a two-stroke engine (these are the ones where you have to mix oil into the gasoline) and develops 1.3 HP.  Being a two-stroke engine, it will most likely eat spark plugs for lunch and stink to high heaven.  In comparison, my electric rototiller, which cost $10 less, develops 2 HP and the only local byproduct is the hot air that blows out of the back of it.

Electric motors have some additional advantages over fossil-fueled motors.

First, electric motors are in a natural stable equilibrium.  Loading an electric motor will cause it to draw more energy to compensate, all by itself.  As load approaches infinity, so does the draw (though physics prevent this from ever actually happening).  If it is lightly loaded, it will naturally draw less energy.

By comparison, a gasoline engine needs a system of governors to keep it in equilibrium.  They are naturally in an unstable equilibrium state, so that an increase in load will be accompanied by a decrease in output, causing the engine to stall.  The governors can increase the fuel flow to counter this, but there is a limit to how much they can do.

With a fully stopped rotor, an electric motor produces its most torque, and an internal combustion engine produces its least.  As such, any gears used can be fixed (i.e. you don’t have to shift them) and you can often get more work done with a smaller electric motor than a larger internal combustion motor.

Next, there is the matter of efficiency.  Internal combustion engines top out at around 30% efficiency.  70% of the fuel entering the engine leaves as heat.  Electric motors top out at (and, in fact, typically get) around 95% efficient.

“But wait!” I hear you saying, “Doesn’t the electricity come from fuel-burning power plants?”

You’re right.  Power plants, however, rarely use internal combustion engines, running instead on steam, gas-turbine, or combined cycle (gas turbine + steam) engines.  These may get as efficient as 55%.  Combined with the energy efficiency of the electric motor, that comes up with a somewhat naïve fiture of 52% efficient (The naïvité stems from the fact that there is some energy lost in transmission).but wait, there’s more!

In addition to that, some electricity is not from fossil-fuels!  That’s right, some of it comes from wind, nuclear, hydro, and occasionally even solar power.  If you are a greenie like me, you may be aware of the fact that you can specify this from your utility in some locations.  I pay a premium of 1¢ per kilowatt-hour for electricity that is 60% wind and 40% hydro.  For a 2¢ premium, you can get 100% wind.  As such, using electricity breaks the tight coupling between what you are trying to do, and the imports of foreign oil.

So, in the end, I use electricity for a lot of things.  I’d drive an electric car if  I could (I believe the fastest-accellerating American-made car is the Tesla Roadster, which is electric and goes from 0-60 in 4.0 seconds).  I use electricity for anything else in my house that moves, and the results are cleaner air, not just here, but everywhere, and my neighbours don’t care if I mow the lawn at 7:00 on a Sunday morning :)

If you can’t open it, you don’t own it.

Spark plug (icon)

Picture this scenario:  You’re driving home from work, and your car’s engine starts to run erratically.  It sounds like it is only firing on 3 cylinders, and the plume of smoke and scent of unburnt fuel tend to confirm this.  You’re almost home, so you limp the rest of the way there, where your neighbour notices your problem and wanders over.

Your neighbour says that if you pop the hood, he’ll have a look at it and see what is wrong.  He’s mechanincally inclined, so you go ahead and pop it, where he finds that one of the wires has worked loose from a spark plug.  He examines the plug, and the socket on the end of the wire, to make sure that they aren’t too badly scorched, then, deciding that they look okay, plugs the wire back in, wiggling it a bit to make sure there is a good connection.  “Turn it over,” he says.

You start your engine.  After a moment of rough running, it levels out and is back to its normal self.  You thank your neighbour for his help and both of you get on with your day.

Now let’s try this another way.

Your neighbour says that if you pop the hood, he’ll have a look at it and see what is wrong, but this time, you can’t pop the hood because the hood is locked, and only the car dealer has the key.  Now you have to make an appointment to get the car fixed, get the car there, maybe take time off from work, and you will be without the car until they are done, however long that is.  We know from the last scenario that this is a simple problem, easily solved in minutes by any knowledgeable person, and yet we are now talking about hours of your time, possibly days of inconvenience, and probably a couple of hundred dollars, all preventable if you could have just opened your hood.

We would never put up with such a scenario, would we?  We would, and we do; not from our cars, to be sure, but certainly from other bits of technology.

Let me give you an example.

I build my own computers, because I find it to be an immensely satisfying thing to do.  In recent years, more frequently, the motherboards have all of the needed bits and pieces on them to do video, audio, networking etc.  Recently, I bought parts for, and built, two computers.

The first computer was designed to be an energy efficient server, to be running 24×7, serving photos and home videos up to family and friends, and providing a common place for files to be stored in our house, rather than having them spread out amongst the 7 computers in the house.  It uses an Intel chipset.

The second computer was designed to be my workstation.  It’s where I surf, code, compile, transcode videos, edit audio, and so on.  I got it a high-powered AMD processor, and made sure that it supported 7.1 channel surround sound.  It uses an nVidia chipset.

Both computers had problems with the drivers for their respective chipsets.  How many of you have had driver problems?  The hands not up either don’t use computers or use Macs.

The problem for the Intel motherboard was in the driver for the network interface.  The good news is that Intel uses open-source drivers.  A quick Google search revealed that Intel offered the source code — essentially the plans — for the driver, and that someone else had already produced a fix.  I downloaded the fix, opened it up and read it, because I can do that, to make sure that there was nothing malicious in there, and installed it.  Problem solved.

The problem for the nVidia motherboard was in the driver for the video.  Without nVidia’s driver, the computer runs at lower resolution, and can’t play video or render 3D graphics.  Unfortunately, nVidia’s drivers are closed-source.  I can’t examine them, and neither can anyone else.  All I can do is play with different versions to see which one works best.  That left me with a choice between three versions: the one that made the screen flicker, the one that randomly forgot to put letters on the screen, or the one that hung up the computer.

While it is granted that not everyone has the technical expertise to write, or even examine, the source code of a device driver, it is also true that not everyone knows what to do once they get the hood of the car open.  Had it not been for that mechanically-inclined neighbour, your car would still be going to the shop.  Had it not been for that mechanically-inclined e-neighbour, my Intel motherboard would be on its way back to Intel.

Ultimately, I was able to find a solution, by swapping the two computers.  The workstation is now a server and the server a workstation.  I have a very powerful server now, far more powerful than necessary, and it uses too much energy.  Alongside that, I have a workstation that works well enough, thanks to a marvelously efficient operating system.  I had to give up my 7.1 channel surround sound in favour of good old-fashioned stereo.  It’s working, but it isn’t what I wanted.

Needless to say, nVidia have made my blacklist.  I don’t really own that computer; nVidia does.  If I want it to do everything it’s supposed to, I’m dependent on nVidia to make it happen.  In this, they have failed.  I can’t even attempt to fix it, either, because I can’t open the code.

Taking this to the greater picture, I want you to think about the things you can’t see into.  Think about the things you think you own, but for which you are totally dependent on someone else, not because they require a service of some sort, but because they require a service from one particular vendor, and no option exists for you, even if you understand how it works, to wrest that control from that vendor for yourself.  As the Maker’s Manifesto says:  If you can’t open it, you don’t own it.

DRM Strikes Again!

According to an article over at the Consumerist, an Amazon Kindle owner recently found his access to the Kindle service revoked because, unrelated to his Kindle, he had ordered and returned too many books.  You know, the dead-tree variety?

The Kindle is specifically designed only to be usable with the Amazon Kindle service (you can’t get e-books from other sources without hacking the device), so without this service,  you can’t get new books, you can’t restore books that you’ve bought to a newer device, and you are basically hosed.

This is on top of last-week’s protests over the Kindle’s text-to-speech capability being killable at a publisher’s whim, leaving vision-impaired Kindle owners in the dark.

Say no to this sort of power-grab.  Only buy real, physical books, unless the e-book is DRM-free.  Then, apparently, get them from someplace other than Amazon until they get this stuff straightened out.  The music industry has finally learned this (and, ironically, Amazon sells DRM-free music),  now, apparently, we need to teach the book industry.

Another Blackberry outage

Blackberry (Icon)

CNN is reporting that there has been another Blackberry outage.  It was less impactful than the last time around, but at least one question remains:  Why does Research in Motion (RIM; maker of the Blackberry) funnel all email traffic through their data centres, rather than having it handled by the individual cellular carriers, which (1) would be like most, if not all, other smart phones, and (2) would provide some diversity?

Don’t get me wrong:  The Blackberry that I’ve been carrying for a couple of years now at the behest of my employer has been pretty reliable.  Even so, it seems that it would be in RIM’s interest to  spread out their infrastructure a bit, at the very least.

Please give a warm welcome.

Bullhorn (Icon)

Please give a warm welcome to my sister, who has just joined the blogosphere with Diary of a Budding Locavore.  Please join her as she documents her efforts to move herself and her family to a diet of locally-grown foods.